Critical minerals (closed)

Close-up view of colorful copper rocks.

As part of the Supply Chain Regulatory Review, we are seeking your input on regulatory challenges related to the critical minerals industry.

Context

The production and processing of many critical minerals are geographically concentrated, making supply vulnerable to socio-economic, geopolitical, environmental, and other risks. However, with its vast resources, strong manufacturing capacity, and experience in upholding high environmental, social and governance standards for projects, Canada is well-positioned to become a secure and reliable supplier of critical minerals for domestic and global supply chains. Increasingly, international trade is seeing movement towards traceability reporting as a means of demonstrating strong environmental, social and governance performance in critical mineral supply chains.

Creating the necessary conditions to remain globally competitive and attract investment to scale-up domestically is critical for Canada to realize its potential in critical minerals development. To this end, effective, predictable and efficient regulatory regimes are fundamental to supporting critical minerals supply chains. This is a complex space, where jurisdiction is divided between federal, provincial, territorial, and/or Indigenous governments, as outlined in the Canadian Constitution and depending on specifics of the context.

Ultimately, coordination and collaboration with provincial, territorial, and Indigenous partners is vital to supporting an efficient and effective regulatory regime and will continue through efforts such as the Regional Energy and Resource Tables and the Critical Minerals Centre of Excellence at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). NRCan leads and coordinates across the federal government on the Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy, which was launched in 2022. The Strategy supports inclusive and efficient regulatory processes and has identified a leadership role for Canada to enhance traceability and avoid a global race to the bottom in our efforts to increase supply chain resiliency. This consultation complements these efforts and seeks targeted input in key areas related to the regulatory environment for the critical minerals value and supply chains, building on engagement undertaken to date.

Share your thoughts

Submit your feedback by February 5, 2024, using one or both of the following ways:

  1. Share your input in the forums under the 'Questions and discussions' tab.
  2. Submit your written feedback as a PDF or Word document using the ‘Document submissions’ tab.

The questions reflect outcomes of previous engagement activities and offer the opportunity to identify specific regulatory issues not already uncovered. You are encouraged to provide examples where possible, including on economic impacts.

Any feedback that falls outside of these questions can be submitted on the Additional supply chain regulatory comments page.

Close-up view of colorful copper rocks.

As part of the Supply Chain Regulatory Review, we are seeking your input on regulatory challenges related to the critical minerals industry.

Context

The production and processing of many critical minerals are geographically concentrated, making supply vulnerable to socio-economic, geopolitical, environmental, and other risks. However, with its vast resources, strong manufacturing capacity, and experience in upholding high environmental, social and governance standards for projects, Canada is well-positioned to become a secure and reliable supplier of critical minerals for domestic and global supply chains. Increasingly, international trade is seeing movement towards traceability reporting as a means of demonstrating strong environmental, social and governance performance in critical mineral supply chains.

Creating the necessary conditions to remain globally competitive and attract investment to scale-up domestically is critical for Canada to realize its potential in critical minerals development. To this end, effective, predictable and efficient regulatory regimes are fundamental to supporting critical minerals supply chains. This is a complex space, where jurisdiction is divided between federal, provincial, territorial, and/or Indigenous governments, as outlined in the Canadian Constitution and depending on specifics of the context.

Ultimately, coordination and collaboration with provincial, territorial, and Indigenous partners is vital to supporting an efficient and effective regulatory regime and will continue through efforts such as the Regional Energy and Resource Tables and the Critical Minerals Centre of Excellence at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). NRCan leads and coordinates across the federal government on the Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy, which was launched in 2022. The Strategy supports inclusive and efficient regulatory processes and has identified a leadership role for Canada to enhance traceability and avoid a global race to the bottom in our efforts to increase supply chain resiliency. This consultation complements these efforts and seeks targeted input in key areas related to the regulatory environment for the critical minerals value and supply chains, building on engagement undertaken to date.

Share your thoughts

Submit your feedback by February 5, 2024, using one or both of the following ways:

  1. Share your input in the forums under the 'Questions and discussions' tab.
  2. Submit your written feedback as a PDF or Word document using the ‘Document submissions’ tab.

The questions reflect outcomes of previous engagement activities and offer the opportunity to identify specific regulatory issues not already uncovered. You are encouraged to provide examples where possible, including on economic impacts.

Any feedback that falls outside of these questions can be submitted on the Additional supply chain regulatory comments page.

Discussions: All (5) Open (0)
  • CLOSED: This consultation has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    What regulatory requirements, gaps and/or misalignment between domestic and international jurisdictions impede the timely import and export of critical minerals to and from, and movement across, Canada?

    Replies Closed
  • CLOSED: This consultation has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    How can regulatory frameworks and standards best support tracing the source and path of critical minerals and tracking their use in the supply chain?

    Replies Closed
  • CLOSED: This consultation has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    How can regulatory processes be improved to clarify approvals and enhance certainty and predictability of timelines for the movement and use of critical minerals (including source material) for industrial purposes, notably for processing and recycling?  

    Replies Closed
  • CLOSED: This consultation has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    What policies, guidelines, and tools could be developed to assist potential investors and current companies to navigate supply chain-related regulatory requirements for critical mineral transportation, processing, stockpiling, recycling/reprocessing and waste management?

    Replies Closed
  • CLOSED: This consultation has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    Reflecting on the full value chain of critical minerals and linkages to electric vehicles (EVs), what specific regulatory changes or practices would improve EV battery development, transportation, storage and recycling, including considerations for spent and non-conforming products and industrial by-products and waste such as black mass?  

    Replies Closed
Page last updated: 04 Mar 2024, 11:30 AM